TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

Romania must seize the opportunities brought by the digital transformation in terms of attracting investments, remaining a competitive economy and retaining highly specialised, value-added jobs. Nevertheless, a structural transformation such as the one facilitated by digital technologies requires a changed of paradigm on how the authorities, companies and citizens tackle the processes in a more simplified and efficient approach, and not only to use electronic means for outdated and bureaucratic processes.

In the past period, the Government and Parliament adopted important legislative acts as government cloud, interoperability, eIDs updates, 5G, Communication Code, clarifications on R&D facilities. Once fully implemented this initiative will represent a major step in the development and de-bureaucratization of Romania and will stimulate investments. Also, an important instrument for identifying the best measures for the digital transition is the ongoing dialogue with the private sector, and the group Law and Technology Law organized at the level of the ITC Committee of the Chamber of Deputies represents a model of best practices for consultation with the business environment.

Romania ranks among the EU countries with highest internet speed and coverage, which represents a competitive advantage for the countries as well as a stimulus for the IT and the whole economic sector. Whether we talk about industry players or about the household needs, the internet coverage is a must. Maintaining this competitive advantage is always easier than recovering a gap.

AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT

BROADBAND PENETRATION AND COVERAGE

ENSURING THE CONDITIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF BROADBAND INTERNET ACCESS SERVICES

The evolution of the retail markets for broadband and TV retransmission services is worrying in terms of the degree of competition and, by implication, in terms of the future consequences for users. Both markets have been dominated by one operator with an increasing market share for a long period of time and which will continue to evolve in the same direction and, relatively soon, monopolize the markets. The market shares we are referring to were, in mid-2022, 64.5% of the broadband market and 76% in the cable TV retransmission services market. Both market shares are above what the law considers a presumption of dominant (or significant) market position and require the application of measures to facilitate the development of other players.

Only by ensuring competitive conditions will it be possible to provide good quality services at low prices to users and meet the 2030 connectivity objective of 1GB for all households, undertaken at European level through the Digital Decade Policy Programme[3]. In the absence of such obligations and having in view the current strategy of this operator (higher prices in less competitive areas than in competitive areas), all customers will be soon left without choice.

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

Achieving the connectivity target mentioned above, as well as the target to cover all populated areas with next-generation high-speed wireless networks with a performance at least equivalent to 5G, requires major investments from operators. As we know, most of the traffic carried over networks is generated by a small number of large digital platforms (such as: Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, etc.), and the telecom industry has suggested to the EU that it should impose a cost sharing mechanism. 

Another important topic for the telecom industry is the correct application of the legal provisions on the construction, modernisation and rehabilitation of motorways, expressways, national roads and bypasses (Law no. 159/2016).  More precisely, it is important that, in these situations, budgets should be allocated  to allow the inclusion in these projects of work to put in place the conduits needed for electronic communication networks. It is also important that the tariffs for accessing the terrain along the roads should be set along with the ANCOM guidelines in this respect.

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

  • Obligations should be imposed on the dominant operator in the broadband and TV retransmission markets, so as to ensure competition in these markets (wholesale access to the operator's network at cost-orientated prices).
  • The Romanian State should support the EU’s efforts to require large digital platforms to bear part of the costs related to telecom networks.
  • The necessary budget should be allocated for compliance with the legal provisions concerning the construction of telecom infrastructure along motorways, national roads, expressways and bypasses when construction/modernisation/rehabilitation work takes place while access tariffs should be aligned with the ANCOM guidelines.

TRANSPARENCY ON DATA ANALYTICS AND ON IMPLEMENTING DATA PROTECTION RULES

Digital society is facing major changes. As more and more of our day-to-day activities go electronic and digital, very large volumes of data about us become available. This phenomenon is aggravated by both technological and behavioural factors (e.g.: increased use of online services such as e-commerce, e-government, social media, etc.). This has been accelerated even more by the pandemic.

Today, many firms are building their business models around the use of this data, especially for advertising, personalised offers and real time customer interactions. This use can also generate services that will benefit both individuals and society in general.

In this context, a user centric privacy framework must be based on a correct understanding of the user’s privacy interests. A consistent user privacy experience should be provided, which establishes familiarity with the privacy implications of applications and services, empowers the user and drives better privacy management while addressing regulatory requirements.

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

All types of digital services are subject to compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which became applicable as from 25 May 2018. Additional rules have been adopted concerning data governance (Regulation (EU) 2022/868 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2022 on European data governance and amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1724/Data Governance Act), digital services (Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market for Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC/Digital Services Act), digital markets (Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828/Digital Markets Act) and network and information security (Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the European Union, amending Regulation (EU) No. 910/2014 and Directive (EU) 2018/1972, and repealing Directive (EU) 2016/1148/EC).

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

In parallel, discussions on finalising the proposal for a regulation on privacy in the electronic environment have continued and new rules have been proposed to regulate artificial intelligence, the European Health Space, and other digital aspects.

Similarly to GDPR, the ePrivacy Regulation aims to review and update data protection rules in the electronic communications field, irrespective of whether the service is free or paid for and including all traditional and modern forms of communication. Although discussions took place before May 2018 (when the GDPR became applicable), no final resolution was reached on the matter.

These legislative changes have a significant impact on all companies carrying out activities in Romania, especially in the ITC and digital services sectors. Companies need to gradually adapt their products and services, as well as their internal processes, to ensure compliance with the regulatory requirements. The authorities have provided only limited support for these efforts, while the amount of information and data available on how the authorities apply the norms is limited.

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

Faced with the rapid development of digital uses and growing threats (viruses, spam, etc.), simple tools need to be put in place to help users to cope with, manage and control their personal data and how it is used.

  • The Government should initiate wide consultations on the impact of the new regulations in the field and on the necessary measures to ensure a reasonable and practical adaptation of the products, services and companies' processes in order to achieve compliance.
  • The Romanian Government should actively participate in the discussions related to the finalisation of the proposed regulations on privacy, artificial intelligence and data, as this legislation will represent a significant change of focus to the rules governing digital services. To define the priorities for its participation, the Government should hold thorough consultations with the industry and other relevant actors.
  • There is a need for increased transparency of the practices of authorities, such as those of the National Supervisory Authority for Personal Data Processing, to ensure the predictable implementation of existing rules.
  • Given that companies process large volumes of personal data in order to carry out business activities, the National Supervisory Authority for Personal Data Processing should issue guidelines on minimum technical and organisational measures which need to be implemented by companies.

TRUST SERVICES

The Electronic Identification and Trust Services Regulation (eIDAS Regulation 910/2014/EC) seeks to enhance trust in electronic transactions by providing a common foundation for secure electronic interaction between citizens, businesses and public authorities, thereby increasing the effectiveness of public and private online services, electronic business and electronic commerce in the EU.

The Regulation lays down the conditions for the recognition of notified electronic identification schemes of Member States, as well as the rules for trust services, especially those for electronic transactions, and establishes a legal framework for electronic signatures, seals and stamps.

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

It became applicable for trust services on 1 July 2016 and finally provided a consistent legal framework for cross-border acceptance of electronic identities and signatures. It is directly applicable in all EU Member States and does not need to be transposed into member states’ national laws. As an exception, some aspects must be defined at national level, such as the liability regime for trust services providers and the legal effects of simple and advanced electronic signatures, as the Regulation does not govern their validity and the evidential weight in court. Qualified electronic signatures are, by Regulation, equivalents to handwritten signatures and have equivalent legal effects.

The internal market principle provides that a qualified trust service based on a qualified certificate issued in one Member State will be recognised as a qualified trust service in all other Member States. Products and trust services that comply with the Regulation need to be permitted to circulate freely in the internal market.

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

At national level, there are three draft laws on electronic signature registered in Parliament by different Parliament members. The public authorities and businesses have embarked on a roller coaster journey to regulate the issues left by the European legislator to the discretion of each Member State.

The main points of discussion and dispute have been related to express recognition of legal effects for all three types of electronic signatures, differentiated according to the level of trust and security and to remote or technology-based identification procedures allowed for the acquisition of qualified electronic signatures.

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected businesses at large, which turned to digital technologies to keep their activities running. Signing documents is one of the most recurrent and important processes in every business. Even in normal conditions, the entire process is time-consuming, requiring printing, exchanging with all signers, and mailing. This became even more challenging when signers started working remotely and needed to avoid physical contact as much as possible. Unfortunately, digitalisation measures such as the recognition of the legal effects of all three types of electronic signatures, which would have facilitated day to day processes, have not yet been enacted in Romania. 

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

The most recent of the draft laws on the use of electronic signatures is even more restrictive in terms of the legal effects of an advanced signature, conferring legal effects equivalent to a holographic signature only to advanced electronic signatures issued by a public authority. We believe that a more flexible approach should be taken, that facilitates the use of an advanced signature, taking into account the technical and legal security considerations – for example, by equating the advanced signature issued by a qualified trust service provider to a handwritten signature (i.e. considering the requirements to which it is subject according to Regulation (EU) no. 910/2014).

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

  • In order to build trust in electronic transactions, which is key to economic and social development, relevant national law-makers, in the Government and Parliament, need to speed the consultation and approval process for the draft legislation on electronic signatures, for the benefit of consumers, businesses and public authorities. 
  • The benefits and convenience offered by digital services (the digital economy) also need to be facilitated through the adoption by the authorities of an approach which is open to innovation. Innovation may involve new authentification and identification technologies and procedures which use responsible security procedures and trustworthy systems.
  • Awareness needs to be created at all levels (among consumers, businesses and authorities) of the use, validity and benefits of electronic signatures and documents. 
  • Last but not least, the regulation of the use of electronic signatures should be done in a uniform and general way, with applicability for all areas.

ROMANIAN E-COMMERCE WITHIN THE DIGITAL SINGLE MARKET – ROMANIA, REGIONAL E-COMMERCE HUB

The e-commerce sector in Romania has experienced rapid growth in recent years, offering numerous benefits to both consumers and businesses, reaching an estimated turnover of EUR 6.5 billion in 2022. The convenience, accessibility and variety of products and services offered through e-commerce platforms have made them a popular choice among Romanian consumers. According to the National Institute of Statistics, in 2022, a record percentage of 66% of Romanian internet users placed at least one online order. We have also seen a spectacular year-on-year increase in the number of rural consumers, of approximately 23% compared to 2021. In addition, the e-commerce sector has created new employment opportunities and contributed significantly to the Romanian economy, while at the same time proving to be an efficient and much less energy-intensive alternative to traditional commerce.

 

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

According to McKinsey & Company, Romania is the third largest digital economy in Central and Eastern Europe, after Poland and the Czech Republic, and has the potential to reach EUR 52 billion by 2030. According to the same study, “Digital Challengers on the next frontier”, in terms of e-commerce, Romania stands out for the largest share of exports in digital commerce, i.e. 24%. At the same time, Romania has a net positive balance in terms of goods sold by Romanian companies to consumers abroad vs. goods bought by Romanian consumers from online stores abroad, in the context in which Romanian companies do not yet enjoy all the advantages of the European Single Market.

However, the sector also faces a series of challenges that limit its potential to contribute even more to the economy and society. These challenges need to be addressed to ensure the continuous development of the digital economy in Romania, so that it can reach its maximum potential as a driver of economic growth.

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

The National Recovery and Resilience Plan, through the funds allocated to digitalisation, can be an important stimulus for the growth of the digital economy in Romania if its implementation is supported by legislative measures, which will allow maximisation of the return on the investments to be made. Thus, the Foreign Investors Council recommends the following:

  • A level playing field should be ensured – Romania should create the right conditions and a level playing field for the digital economy to flourish. This will require full alignment of national legislation with EU regulations in a form that does not generate additional burdens on companies operating in Romania.
  • Demand for online public services should be stimulated – According to INS data, 95.4% of people aged 16-74 in Romania used the Internet in 2022. Among them, approximately 81% did so to access social networks and only 15.8% used the Internet to interact with authorities or public services for personal purposes. Thus, in order to stimulate the use of online public services, public authorities could implement measures such as offering additional discounts for the payment of fees and taxes online, facilitating more widespread use of cards, or by setting shorter deadlines for the release of documents requested by online forms. Encouraging online interaction with the state could also bring beneficial side effects, such as increasing digital skills among the population, increasing the degree of financial inclusion, as well as generating wider acceptance of electronic payments among the population.
  • Progress needs to be made on legislation on use of an electronic identity card in the relationship with private entities. According to a draft Government ordinance which has been submitted for public debate by the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the electronic identity card will contain an advanced electronic signature issued by the Ministry of Internal Affairs, and documents signed with it will have, in the relationship of the eID holder with the State, the legal value of handwritten signed documents. According to this draft legislation (both in the legislative act to be promoted by the Ministry of Internal Affairs, and in the new Law on electronic signatures), private entities will be able to choose to offer the same legal value to this advanced electronic signature as that offered by the State, We urge the authorities to implement this legislation without delay, preferably in the first half of 2023.
  • Cross-border trade should be encouraged. Considering the proven potential of e-commerce in terms of exports, we consider that all future proposed measures should be evaluated in terms of the competitiveness of Romanian companies on the European Single Market.

ELECTRONIC IDENTITY

After repeated delays, in July Parliament adopted a bill initiated by the Government in 2016 on electronic IDs. The new legislation, which became Law no. 162/2020, provides for the issuing of electronic IDs that would allow Romanian citizens to identify themselves in relation to electronic databases of Romanian public authorities as well as private third parties.

Furthermore, the law states that electronic IDs will incorporate an advanced certificate for electronic signature to be issued by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and will also allow storage of a qualified certificate for electronic signature issued by a qualified services provider.

The implementation of the law would allow citizens to benefit from a large range of private electronic services, including banking, insurance, telecom services etc. However, the implementing rules of the law make no reference to the issuance of the related qualification certificates.

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

Electronic IDs would also “open the door” to Romanian citizens to also authenticate themselves in other EU Member States, if they are notified to and accepted by the European Commission as the Romanian national electronic identification scheme. Mutually recognised electronic identification means would facilitate cross-border provision of numerous services and enable businesses to operate cross-border without facing many obstacles they currently encounter in interactions with public authorities.

Moreover, by adopting Emergency Ordinance no. 38/2020 on the use of documents in electronic format in relations with public authorities and institutions, the Government created the framework through which public authorities are required to accept electronic signatures in relation to taxpayers.

Furthermore, the Authority for the Digitalisation of Romania (ADR) has been quite active. On 1 September 2020, the ADR announced the signing of a contract worth nearly RON 100 million for a Centralised Software Platform for Digital Identification - “PSCID". The aim is to ensure the proper “gateway” for the use of electronic signatures in relation to public authorities. However, the project was launched without proper consultation with stakeholders.

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

In October 2020, the ADR launched a public consultation on a major public policy proposal on eGovernment. The aim of the project is to develop the institutional capacity of public authorities to create and implement eGovernment tools for citizens and the business environment, as well as to ensure the vision and directions of action in eGovernment.

In 2021, the ADR issued a rule on the regulation, recognition, approval or acceptance of the remote personal identification procedure by using video means. This rule allowed the implementation of remote authentication, through video means, at public institutions such as ANAF. However, the process of obtaining ADR approval by a third party for the use of such methods is not transparent, inhibiting the enrolment of private service providers. This facility, both from a legislative point of view, but especially from a functional point of view, should not be a substitute for efforts to issue and integrate electronic identity documents.

One negative aspect is that the two bills initiated in 2019, and which were meant to create a national framework for fully implementing Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market (eIDAS), are still awaiting the decision of the Chamber of Deputies. As a result, national legislation on the use of electronic signatures remains unclear.

However, even though some progress has been made, there are still steps that need to be taken before this progress is seen by citizens and the business environment, as well as by public authorities.

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

  • In the context of the implementation of the electronic identity card project, the Government should make every effort to issue and register the associated qualified certificate at the time of issuing an electronic identity card.
  • Requirements and standards for the advanced certificate to be issued by the Ministry of Internal Affairs should be in line with European standards, so it can be recognised under e-IDAS.
  • Awareness and education campaigns should be supported by relevant industries to highlight the important benefits of e-IDs and to encourage an increase in the speed of e-ID adoption.
  • MPs should resume debates on the bills on electronic signatures and Parliament should vote on the new legislation as soon as possible.
  • Transparency over government projects should increase, while there should be more openness towards the business environment, NGOs, academia and other interested parties from both the executive and the legislature. This is of particular importance as many drafts lack the required quality for them to undergo legislative process procedures and, since some public authorities do not have enough professionals among their staff, an effective consultation process could help improve the quality of the legislative process. 
  • The European Union continues the funding of and the efforts related to the industrialisation of the “digital wallet”, where digital identity is a central component, through funded research programs such as POTENTIAL, NOBID, EU-Digital Wallet Consortium and DC4EU. Several European governments (Italy, Latvia, Iceland, Denmark, etc.) are directly involved in this industrialisation process, and the Romanian Government, through the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization, should ensure the right environment for the adoption of the necessary protocols and technologies in order to reach a similar level of implementation at institutional level. At the end of the project phase, the following use cases should be supported: SIM registration, opening bank accounts, obtaining driving licenses, using government services, digital signatures, obtaining medical prescriptions, and making bank payments.

SMART CITY INITIATIVES

Over the last decade, the development of information technologies, sensors, big data and products/services based on information has changed the way people live in cities. Access to information, services and communication is now provided anywhere and anytime by smartphones and people have adapted to this new way of living. This has created an urban environment with a growing demand for efficiency and resources. As a result, public administrations need to consider the development of the management models of cities. Moreover, Romania needs to eliminate the digital divide and ensure strong gigabit and 5G connectivity. 5G is not just about improving quality and meeting increased demand; it is also a key asset for Romania to compete, especially in relation to manufacturing, cities, transport, vehicles, utilities, and connected healthcare. 
 

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

The development of smart cities, and the digitalisation of business will support the green transition. For example Smart Energy Meters enable businesses, municipal authorities and households to monitor, manage and reduce their energy use. Smart cities improve the efficiency of energy-intensive services such as public transport, public road networks and street lighting. The conception and development of Smart Cities is highly dependent on Internet of Things technologies, and sometime the two become synonymous.

Smart cities deliver a huge breadth of opportunities and benefits. Some key highlights are smart grids, as well as greater mobility, better protection of the environment and greater safety. Smart Grids work with connected sensors in various municipal systems to help cities to become more efficient by better managing energy demand and supply. With connected mobility infrastructure, smart cities can manage traffic flows and public transport services to reduce congestion and support the mobility of citizens. By managing congestion, smart cities can also help to improve air quality, while smart municipal services can manage wider pollution through intelligent waste removal. Finally, by using an integrated system, smart cities can improve safety in traffic, as well as facilitate wider security management e.g. through optimal allocation of security resources and traffic management for emergency responses.

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

The main challenge the public sector faces in responding to the opportunities a “smart city” brings is to quantify the impact of disruptive technologies. This can lead to challenging investment decisions. The structure and culture of city councils can impede strategic thinking on information and communications technology and the required organisational changes can be hard to implement.

In Romania, 594 smart city projects had been implemented by June 2020 in 87 cities; almost double compared to the beginning of 2019. The projects are grouped within the six Smart City Verticals – Smart Economy, Smart Mobility, Smart Environment, Smart People, Smart Living and Smart Governance.

The leading cities, by number of planned projects, work in progress or finalised projects are: Alba Iulia (106), Cluj-Napoca (54), Timișoara (26), Arad (19), Iași (19), Brașov (18), Bucharest– Sector 4 (18), Oradea (17), Sibiu (16), Piatra Neamț (15), according to the Romanian Association for Smart cities.

Among the solutions introduced in Alba, the following stand out: free Wi-Fi in public areas and public transport, traffic management, an environment monitoring dashboard with comparative measurements in urban and suburban areas, real time notifications on the public transport schedule, smart lighting, and a city proximity engagement platform promoting tourism, water management in remote areas, as well as online surveys.

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

  • Local authorities will need to set up the necessary regulatory framework and related legislation on acquisitions, as well as choosing the right financing model.
  • At national level, a smart city guide should be developed that can be adjusted and replicated among local authorities.
  • The smart city guide should include an open data system which allows data collection and processing from various vendors in order to be shared with stakeholders (citizens, as well as private and public institutions). Moreover, the existing open data project references from Romanian municipalities could be aggregated and presented within a best practices ‘’Open Data Portal’’. As an alternative, they could be listed on https://data.gov.ro
  • Examples from such data sets references can be obtained from Iasi, Cluj, Alba Iulia and Brasov.  
  • Following the programmes funded by the European Union, the C-ITS initiative (Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems) that allows V2X (vehicle to anything) communication, between cars in traffic, cars and road infrastructure or cars to people has reached a pilot implementation level in several locations in the European Union, such as Germany and Ireland. To gain the benefits of this communication system, developed at European level, the preparation of a suitable legislative framework is necessary, together with the digitalisation of the smart road infrastructure within urban centres and large infrastructures (motorways, road junctions, etc.). The benefits of the system are part of the European mission to reduce the number of deaths from road accidents to 0 by 2050 through the development of: automatic warning systems (intersection collision, dangerous situation, etc.), sensor systems (overtaking warning, adaptive cruise control, emergency vehicle priority, etc.) and cooperative driving (platooning, synchronous lane changing, synchronous overtaking).
  • One aspect that could delay the implementation of Smart City initiatives is the lack of clarity in the implementation of Law no. 163/2021 on the adoption of measures relating to information and communication infrastructure of national interest and the conditions for the implementation of 5G networks (the “5G Law”). In its current form, the 5G Law has the potential to generate substantial costs for the telecom industry, as demonstrated by the results which were far below expectations of the tender for the 5G spectrum, as a result of the absence of some important players. This could lead to blockages and delays in the implementation of 5G technology. In this context, we consider that certain aspects regulated by the 5G Law should be clarified, either by amendments to it or by the adoption of guidelines on its application, in relation to the applicability of the law in the case of 5G equipment installed in areas considered non-critical.
  • This clarification would also be in line with the European Commission Communication approving the joint toolbox of mitigating measures agreed by Member States to address security risks related to the rollout of 5G technology (the “5G Joint Toolbox”), according to which 5G equipment manufacturers considered to be at high risk can be excluded in order to mitigate risks only in the case of important assets (such as the network core, assets that provide network management and orchestration and network access functions). Areas that are designated as non-critical should not normally house important assets, so the risk of incidents affecting national security should be extremely low or even non-existent.
  • This concept of differentiating between critical and non-critical areas (which the 5G Law does not expressly prohibit) is also used by other Member States, including France and Spain, which regulate differently the authorisation of equipment located in critical areas as compared to equipment located in non-critical areas, and critical areas are established based on clear criteria.
  • Making the clarifications as set out above will have the effect of boosting the development of 5G networks, with positive consequences including for Smart City initiatives and the elimination of the digital gap.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Research and development activity is considered a national priority as it has a significant role in the sustainable economic development strategy.

Thus, the tax facilities currently available in Romania consist of granting an additional deduction of 50% for research and development costs, income tax exemption for employees who carry out such activities, as well as the possibility of profit tax exemption in the first 10 years of activity for companies that carry out research-development activities exclusively.

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

The legislation that regulates fiscal incentives for research and development activities was introduced in Romania more than 10 years ago, and has undergone several changes since then.

The latest legislative amendments adopted, applicable from 1 January 2023, consist of the regulation of a framework structure for the National Register of Experts, the clarification and improvement of the way of carrying out the certification process through the existence of framework models for each necessary part of the expert report, as well as the introduction of the requirement for large taxpayers to certify the research and development projects for which they apply the additional deduction when calculating profit tax.

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

FIC RECOMMENDATIONS

The FIC appreciates the authorities’ efforts to clarify/improve the legislation related to tax relief for research and development, considering that the existence of a transparent, objective, and predictable framework for the application of this relief has the role of stimulating companies to invest in this type of activity.

In order to continue the positive steps towards multiplying investments in research and development activities, but especially to attract foreign capital and new investors to the local market, we recommend the following steps:

  • Clarification of the legislation concerning the 10-year profit tax exemption relief for companies that exclusively carry out research and development activities. The drafting of implementing rules that would allow the effective application of this relief would represent a significant competitive advantage as compared to other European states, especially considering the investments announced recently relating to a sustainable future through new technologies and renewable energy, as well as in other areas that normally have the potential to give rise to research and development activities. Currently, the exemption is not applicable due to the almost non-existent legislative framework.
  • An increase in the additional deduction rate (currently 50%) when calculating corporate tax, following the example of neighbouring states that practice significantly higher deduction rates. Most jurisdictions in the Central and Eastern Europe region (Czech Republic, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Hungary, etc.) grant deductions of over 100% of the total amount of eligible expenses for research and development activities. The most generous provisions in this respect are those in countries such as Lithuania, Slovakia, Hungary, Poland and Croatia, where additional deductions reach significant values of up to 200%, even record values of up to 300% of the total eligible expenditure for research and development activities.
  • Clarification of the legislative provisions and making their application easier, both in terms of the application of fiscal incentives and in terms of the certification procedure by an expert registered with the National Register of Experts, as well as clearer definition of the scope of eligible activities that are considered for the application of research and development incentives. It is important that, given the ultimate goal of increasing investment in this area, the legislation should not restrict the areas of applicability of the incentives.
  • The legislative measures which entered into force on 1 January 2023 should be improved through a reduction in the additional administrative and bureaucratic burden on taxpayers, to encourage full use of the facilities and avoid situations in which taxpayers consider the whole process to be unprofitable and inefficient.